ProtonBlog(new window)

In late August, a security advisory(new window) was published regarding a newly discovered exploit affecting email providers. The issue, dubbed as “ROPEMAKER”, stands for “Remotely Originated Post-delivery Email Manipulation Attacks Keeping Email Risky”.

The attack is an interesting one so our security team took a closer look at it. The RopeMaker technique allows an attacker to visually modify a HTML email, sent by the attacker, even after it’s been delivered. In some cases, RopeMaker can also be used to modify the HTML code of an email as well. For example, an attacker could change a good link into a malicious link, or edit the body of an email at will, all without access to the mailbox, and even after the email has been delivered(new window).

Based on the security advisory, Outlook, Apple Mail, and Mozilla Thunderbird are/were vulnerable to this issue. Unfortunately, there’s no fix that you can make yourself to prevent this attack if you’re using one of these email applications. You’ll instead have to wait for these services to patch their systems.

How it Works

The main requirement for achieving a successful RopeMaker attack is when the email client allows remote CSS files to be rendered. The remote CSS file acts as a “modification backdoor” for the attacker/sender in the RopeMaker technique.

RopeMaker and Proton Mail

After analyzing the security advisory, we immediately performed an internal review of our CSS rendering processes. We can confirm that Proton Mail is not affected by the RopeMaker technique, and was not previously affected by it. However, we will be doing some additional development in order to further harden Proton Mail against future, not-yet-discovered exploits which may leverage some of the same techniques as RopeMaker.

At Proton Mail, we are serious about being the most secure email provider. A large part of ensuring a safe email experience is through engineering with security and privacy as the core principle, and not as merely an afterthought. However, even then, there is no such thing as 100% security, so providing the safest email service also requires active monitoring of the latest security threats to emerge.

As part of our email security efforts, our internal security team monitors numerous security mailing lists, forums, and other locations with relevant online chatter in order to identify and block threats before they can be exploited. In addition to our extensive internal efforts to protect Proton Mail users, we also host a bug bounty program to work with security researchers around the world in improving the security state of both Proton Mail and Proton VPN. Through leveraging the expertise of the global security community, we can ensure that Proton Mail is as safe as possible.

Secure your emails, protect your privacy
Get Proton Mail free

Related articles

chrome password manager
You likely know you should store and manage your passwords safely. However, even if you are using a password manager, there’s a chance the one you’re using isn’t as secure as it could be. In this article we go over the threats some password managers
sensitive information
We all have sensitive personal information we’d all rather not share, whether it’s documents, photographs, or even private video. This article covers how to handle sensitive information or records, and what you can do to keep private information priv
Social engineering is a common hacking tactic involving psychological manipulation used in cybersecurity attacks to access or steal confidential information. They then use this information to commit fraud, gain unauthorized access to systems, or, in
is whatsapp safe for sending private photos
WhatsApp is the world’s leading messaging app, trusted by billions of people around the globe to send and receive messages. However, is WhatsApp safe for sending private photos? Or are there better ways to share photos online privately? Let’s find ou
passwordless future
With the advent of passkeys, plenty of people are predicting the end of passwords. Is the future passwordless, though? Or is there room for both types of authentication to exist side-by-side?  At Proton, we are optimistic about passkeys and have int
At Proton, we have always been highly disciplined, focusing on how to best sustain our mission over time. This job is incredibly difficult. Everything we create always takes longer and is more complex than it would be if we did it without focusing on